Utilize este identificador para referenciar este registo: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.10/1517
Título: Incidence of postoperative residual neuromuscular blockade in the postanaesthesia care unit: an observational multicentre study in Portugal.
Autor: Esteves, S
Martins, M
Barros, F
Barros, F
Canas, M
Vitor, P
Seabra, M
Castro, M
Bastardo, I
Palavras-chave: Neuromuscular blockade
Anesthesia recovery period
Incidence
Portugal
Data: 2013
Editora: European Academy of Anaesthesiology
Citação: Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2013 May;30(5):243-9
Resumo: CONTEXT: Residual neuromuscular blockade still presents despite the use of intermediate duration muscle relaxants and is a risk factor for postoperative morbidity. OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence of incomplete postoperative neuromuscular recovery from anaesthesia in a postanaesthesia care unit. DESIGN: Multicentre observational study. SETTING: Public Portuguese hospitals. PATIENTS: Adult patients scheduled for elective surgery requiring general anaesthesia with neuromuscular blocking agents. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: An independent anaesthesiologist measured neuromuscular transmission by the TOF-Watch SX acceleromyograph. Train-of-four ratios at least 0.9 and less than 0.9 were assessed as complete and incomplete neuromuscular recovery following general anaesthesia, respectively. RESULTS: The study population consisted of 350 patients [134 men and 216 women, mean (SD) age 54.3 (15.9) years]. Ninety-one patients had a train-of-four ratio less than 0.9 on arrival in the postanaesthesia care unit, an incidence of residual neuromuscular blockade of 26% [95% confidence interval (CI) 21 to 31%]. The most frequent neuromuscular blockers were rocuronium (44.2%) and cisatracurium (32%). A neuromuscular block reversal agent was used in 66.6% of the patients (neostigmine in 97%). The incidence of residual neuromuscular blockade in patients receiving reversal agents was 30% (95% CI 25 to 37%). There were no statistically significant differences in the occurrence of residual blockade relating to the neuromuscular blocker used, although higher percentages were observed for cisatracurium (32.4%) and vecuronium (32%) compared with atracurium (23.6%) and rocuronium (20.8%). Incomplete neuromuscular recovery was significantly more frequent among patients who had received a reversal agent (30.5 vs. 17.1%, P = 0.01). Incomplete neuromuscular recovery was more frequent in patients given propofol than in those exposed to sevoflurane (26.2 vs. 14.3%). CONCLUSION: The incidence of incomplete neuromuscular recovery of 26% confirms that it is relatively frequent in the postoperative period and calls attention to the dimension of this problem in Portugal
Peer review: yes
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.10/1517
DOI: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e32835dccd7
Aparece nas colecções:ANES - Artigos

Ficheiros deste registo:
Ficheiro Descrição TamanhoFormato 
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2013 May, 30(5) 243-9.pdf239,25 kBAdobe PDFVer/Abrir    Acesso Restrito. Solicitar cópia ao autor!


FacebookTwitterDeliciousLinkedInDiggGoogle BookmarksMySpace
Formato BibTex MendeleyEndnote Degois 

Todos os registos no repositório estão protegidos por leis de copyright, com todos os direitos reservados.