Repository logo
 
Publication

Ghost Infarct Core and Admission Computed Tomography Perfusion: Redefining the Role of Neuroimaging in Acute Ischemic Stroke

dc.contributor.authorMartins, N
dc.contributor.authorAires, A
dc.contributor.authorMendez, B
dc.contributor.authorBoned, S
dc.contributor.authorRubiera, M
dc.contributor.authorTomasello, A, et al.
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-18T14:27:35Z
dc.date.available2019-03-18T14:27:35Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Determining the size of infarct extent is crucial to elect patients for reperfusion therapies. Computed tomography perfusion (CTP) based on cerebral blood volume may overestimate infarct core on admission and consequently include ghost infarct core (GIC) in a definitive lesional area. PURPOSE: Our goal was to confirm and better characterize the GIC phenomenon using CTP cerebral blood flow (CBF) as the reference parameter to determine infarct core. METHODS: We performed a retrospective, single-center analysis of consecutive thrombectomies of middle cerebral or intracranial internal carotid artery occlusions considering noncontrast CT Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score ≥6 in patients with pretreatment CTP. We used the RAPID® software to measure admission infarct core based on initial CBF. The final infarct was extracted from follow-up CT. GIC was defined as initial core minus final infarct > 10 mL. RESULTS: A total of 123 patients were included. The median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score was 18 (13-20), the median time from symptoms to CTP was 188 (67-288) min, and the recanalization rate (Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score 2b, 2c, or 3) was 83%. Twenty patients (16%) presented with GIC. GIC was associated with shorter time to recanalization (150 [105-291] vs. 255 [163-367] min, p = 0.05) and larger initial CBF core volume (38 [26-59] vs. 6 [0-27] mL, p < 0.001). An adjusted logistic regression model identified time to recanalization < 302 min (OR 4.598, 95% CI 1.143-18.495, p = 0.032) and initial infarct volume (OR 1.01, 95% CI 1.001-1.019, p = 0.032) as independent predictors of GIC. At 24 h, clinical improvement was more frequent in patients with GIC (80 vs. 49%, p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: CTP CBF < 30% may overestimate infarct core volume, especially in patients imaged in the very early time window and with fast complete reperfusion. Therefore, the CTP CBF technique may exclude patients who would benefit from endovascular treatment.pt_PT
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionpt_PT
dc.identifier.citationInterv Neurol. 2018 Oct;7(6):513-521pt_PT
dc.identifier.doi10.1159/000490117pt_PT
dc.identifier.issn1664-5545
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.10/2178
dc.language.isoengpt_PT
dc.peerreviewedyespt_PT
dc.publisherSG Kargerpt_PT
dc.subjectAcute ischemic strokept_PT
dc.subjectStrokept_PT
dc.subjectPerfusion imagingpt_PT
dc.titleGhost Infarct Core and Admission Computed Tomography Perfusion: Redefining the Role of Neuroimaging in Acute Ischemic Strokept_PT
dc.typejournal article
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.conferencePlaceBaselpt_PT
oaire.citation.endPage521pt_PT
oaire.citation.startPage513pt_PT
oaire.citation.titleInterventional Neurologypt_PT
oaire.citation.volume7pt_PT
rcaap.rightsclosedAccesspt_PT
rcaap.typearticlept_PT

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
Interv Neurol. 2018.pdf
Size:
687.73 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: