Repository logo
 
Publication

Lithotripsy Performance of Specially Designed Laser Fiber Tips

dc.contributor.authorKronenberg, P
dc.contributor.authorTraxer, O
dc.date.accessioned2017-03-13T15:18:44Z
dc.date.available2017-03-13T15:18:44Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.description.abstractWe evaluated and compared a standard laser lithotripsy fiber to laser fibers claimed to have lithotripsy performance enhancing features. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A special AccuMax™ 200 polished tip fiber and an AccuTrac™ ball-shaped tip fiber, each with an approximately 240 μm core, were compared to a standard 272 μm core fiber (Rocamed™). The polished and ball-shaped tip fibers were used and reused without preparation. The standard fiber was stripped and cleaved according to manufacturer instructions after each experiment. An automated laser fragmentation testing system was used to perform multiple 30-second laser lithotripsy experiments. To mimic most typical lithotripsy conditions soft and hard stone materials were used with high frequency, low pulse energy (20 Hz and 0.5 J) or with low frequency, high pulse energy (5 Hz and 2.0 J) lithotripter settings. Ablation volumes and laser fiber tip photographs before and after lithotripsy were compared. RESULTS: The standard and ball-shaped tip fibers did not differ in ablation volume (p = 0.72) but they ablated 174% and 188% more stone, respectively, than the polished tip fiber (p <0.0001). The ball-shaped tip showed remarkable fiber tip degradation after short-term use at low frequency, high pulse energy settings. When high pulse energy settings were applied first even for short-term use, the ablation volume achieved by the polished and ball-shaped tip fibers at high frequency, low pulse energy settings decreased more than 20%. CONCLUSIONS: The standard laser fiber was as good as and sometimes better than the specially designed fibers. Rapid degradation of the specially designed laser fiber tips strongly limits their general usefulness but ball-shaped tip fibers may be useful in specific situations.pt_PT
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionpt_PT
dc.identifier.citationJ Urol. 2016 May;195(5):1606-12pt_PT
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.juro.2015.10.135.pt_PT
dc.identifier.issn1527-3792
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.10/1823
dc.language.isoengpt_PT
dc.peerreviewedyespt_PT
dc.publisherElsevierpt_PT
dc.subjectUrinary calculipt_PT
dc.subjectLaser lithotripsypt_PT
dc.subjectLitotrícia a laserpt_PT
dc.titleLithotripsy Performance of Specially Designed Laser Fiber Tipspt_PT
dc.typejournal article
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.conferencePlaceNew Yorkpt_PT
oaire.citation.endPage1612pt_PT
oaire.citation.startPage1606pt_PT
oaire.citation.titleJournal of Urology, Thept_PT
oaire.citation.volume195pt_PT
rcaap.rightsrestrictedAccesspt_PT
rcaap.typearticlept_PT

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
J Urol. 2016 May.pdf
Size:
1.83 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: