Repository logo
 
Publication

High-risk features in potentially resectable colon cancer: a prospective MDCT-pathology agreement study

dc.contributor.authorSantiago, I
dc.contributor.authorRodrigues, E
dc.contributor.authorGermano, A
dc.contributor.authorCosta, A
dc.contributor.authorManso, RT
dc.contributor.authorGomes, A
dc.contributor.authorLeichsenring, C
dc.contributor.authorGeraldes, V
dc.date.accessioned2016-11-28T14:13:06Z
dc.date.available2016-11-28T14:13:06Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.description.abstractNeoadjuvant chemotherapy in potentially resectable high-risk Stage II and Stage III colon cancer has demonstrated promising results in the PRODIGE 22-ECKINOXE Phase II trial. Identification of adverse morphologic features, namely T3 with >5 mm extramural extension/T4 stages and/or N2, is fundamental and requires accurate noninvasive imaging. Our aim was to assess the value of optimized preoperative MDCT to stratify potentially resectable colon cancer patients for neoadjuvant therapy. METHODS: this is an observational prospective cross-sectional radiologic-pathologic agreement study. All patients with colon cancer referred to our Institution's Radiology department for preoperative MDCT staging between 01-10-2013 and 11-02-2015 underwent independent reading based on axial and multiplanar reconstruction images by 3 radiologists with 3, 6, and 20 years of experience in gastrointestinal radiology. T stage, extramural extension if T3 (≤5 mm or >5 mm), and N stage were recorded. Surgical specimens subsequently obtained underwent micro-pathologic analysis by a gastrointestinal pathologist with 9 years of experience in gastrointestinal pathology. Main outcome measures were sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, AUROC, diagnostic accuracy, and interobserver agreement of optimized MDCT, and pathologic analysis of the surgical specimen considered the reference standard. RESULTS: 74 patients [43 males; median age 73 (45-89)] were eligible. MDCT sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, AUROC, and diagnostic accuracy ranged between 42.9-76.2, 75.5-90.6, 55.2-76.2, 80.0-90.6, 0.67-0.83 and 0.76-0.86%, respectively, for the identification of T3 > 5 mm/T4 disease, with moderate interobserver agreement (0.49); and 8.3-33.3, 93.5-98.4, 20-66.7, 84.1-88.2, 0.51-0.65 and 0.80-0.86%, respectively, for the identification of N2 disease, with absent interobserver agreement (0.10). CONCLUSIONS: Specificity of MDCT in the stratification of patients for neoadjuvant therapy may be high enough to prevent overtreatment. However, it may lead to undertreatment in a meaningful proportion of patients. Observer performance may benefit from targeted training programs, given the variability and observer dependence of the results. Limitations include 4-slice MDCT equipment, time to surgery and lack of long-term outcome information based on imaging parameters per se.pt_PT
dc.identifier.citationAbdom Radiol (NY). 2016 Oct;41(10):1877-90pt_PT
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00261-016-0782-zpt_PT
dc.identifier.issn2366-0058
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.10/1769
dc.language.isoengpt_PT
dc.peerreviewedyespt_PT
dc.publisherSociety of Abdominal Radiologistspt_PT
dc.subjectColonic neoplasmspt_PT
dc.subjectNeoadjuvant chemotherapypt_PT
dc.subjectMultidetector computed tomographypt_PT
dc.subjectNeoplasias do colónpt_PT
dc.titleHigh-risk features in potentially resectable colon cancer: a prospective MDCT-pathology agreement studypt_PT
dc.typejournal article
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.conferencePlaceHoustonpt_PT
oaire.citation.endPage1890pt_PT
oaire.citation.startPage1877pt_PT
oaire.citation.titleAbdominal radiologypt_PT
oaire.citation.volume41pt_PT
rcaap.rightsrestrictedAccesspt_PT
rcaap.typearticlept_PT

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2016 Oct.pdf
Size:
2.83 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: