Repository logo

Browsing by Author "Antunes, C"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Saúde para todos: especialidades: cooperação portuguesa com São Tomé e Príncipe na área da cardiologia
    Publication . Loureiro, J; Freitas, A; Antunes, C
    A estrutura e o trabalho desenvolvido pelo Instituto Marquês de Valle Flõr (IMVF) no campo da cooperação na área da saúde em São Tomé e Príncipe foi descrita em número anterior da Revista Clínica do Hospital Prof. Doutor Fernando Fonseca. Neste artigo, pretende-se descrever o contributo da cardiologia no âmbito do programa Saúde para Todos – Especialidades, lançado pelo IMVF em 2010.
    2015Journal article Open access Show more
  • The Index of Microcirculatory Resistance as a Predictor of Echocardiographic Left Ventricular Performance Recovery in Patients With ST-Elevation Acute Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Successful Primary Angioplasty.
    Publication . Faustino, M; Baptista, SB; Freitas, A; Monteiro, C; Leal, P; Nédio, M; Antunes, C; Abreu, PF; Gil, V; Morais, C
    BACKGROUND: This study aims to evaluate the relationship between IMR (Index of Microcirculatory Resistance) and the echocardiographic evolution of left ventricular (LV) systolic and diastolic performance after ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction (STEMI), undergoing primary angioplasty (P-PCI). METHODS: IMR was evaluated immediately after P-PCI. Echocardiograms were performed within the first 24 hours (Echo1) and at 3 months (Echo2): LV volumes, ejection fraction (LVEF), wall motion score index (WMSI), E/é ratio, global longitudinal strain (GLS), and left atrial volume were measured. RESULTS: Forty STEMI patients were divided in 2 groups according to median IMR: Group 1 (IMR < 26), with less microvascular dysfunction, and Group 2 (IMR > = 26), with more microvascular dysfunction. In Echo1 GLS was significantly better in Group 1 (-14.9 vs. -12.9 in Group 2, P = 0.005). However, there were no significant differences between the two groups in LV systolic volume, LVEF and WMS. Between Echo1 and Echo2, there were significant improvements in LVEF (0.48 ± 0.06 vs. 0.55 ± 0.06, P < 0.0001), GLS (-14.9 ± 1.3 vs. -17.3 ± 7.6, P = 0.001), and E/é ratio (9.3 ± 3.4 vs. 8.2 ± 2.0, P = 0.037) in Group 1, but not in Group 2: LVEF (0.49 ± 0.06 vs. 0.50 ± 0.05, P = 0.47), GLS (-12.9 ± 2.4 vs. -14.4 ± 3.2, P = 0.052), and E/é ratio (8.8 ± 2.4 vs. 10.0 ± 4.7, P = 0.18). WMSI improved significantly more in Group 1 (reduction of -17.1% vs. -6.8% in Group 2, P = 0.015). CONCLUSION: Lower IMR was associated with better myocardial GLS acutely after STEMI, and with a significantly higher recovery of the LVEF, WMSI, E/E' ratio and GLS, suggesting that IMR is an early marker of cardiac recovery, after acute myocardial infarction.
    2016Journal article Restricted access Show more