Repository logo
 
Publication

Outcomes of endoscopic management of primary and refractory postcholecystectomy biliary leaks in a multicentre review of 178 patients

dc.contributor.authorCanena, J
dc.contributor.authorHorta, D
dc.contributor.authorCoimbra, J
dc.contributor.authorMeireles, L
dc.contributor.authorRusso, P
dc.contributor.authorMarques, I, e outros
dc.date.accessioned2016-03-29T13:55:32Z
dc.date.available2016-03-29T13:55:32Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Biliary leaks have been treated with endoscopic management using different techniques with conflicting results. Furthermore the appropriate rescue therapy for refractory leaks has not been established. We evaluated the clinical effectiveness of initial endotherapy for postcholecystectomy biliary leaks using an homogenous approach (sphincterotomy + placement of a 10-French plastic stent) in a large series of patients as well as the optimal and efficacy of rescue endotherapy for refractory biliary leaks. METHODS: This was a multicenter, retrospective study of 178 patients who underwent endoscopic management of postcholecystectomy biliary leaks with a combination of biliary sphincterotomy and the placement of a large-bore (10-French) plastic stent. Data were collected to analyze the clinical outcomes and technical success, efficacy of the rescue endotherapy and the need for surgery, adverse events and prognostic factors for clinical success of endotherapy. RESULTS: Following endotherapy, closure of the leak was accomplished in 162/178 patients (91.0%). The multivariate logistic model showed that the type of leak, namely a high-grade biliary leak, was the only independent prognostic factor associated with treatment failure (OR = 26.78; 95% CI = 6.59-108.83; P < 0.01). The remaining 16 patients were treated with multiple plastic stents (MPSs) with a success rate of 62.5% (10 patients). The use of fewer than 3 plastic stents (P = 0.023) and a high-grade biliary leak (P = 0.034) were shown to be significant predictors of treatment failure with MPSs in refractory bile leaks. The 6 patients in whom the placement of MPSs failed were retreated with a fully cover self-expandable metallic stent (FCSEMS), resulting in closure of the leak in all cases. CONCLUSIONS: Endotherapy of biliary leaks with a combination of biliary sphincterotomy and the placement of a large-bore plastic stent is associated with a high rate of success (90%). However in our series there were several failures using MPSs as a strategy for rescue endotherapy suggesting that refractory biliary leaks should be treated with FCSEMS especially in patients with high-grade leaks.pt_PT
dc.identifier.citationBMC Gastroenterol. 2015 Aug 19;15:105pt_PT
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12876-015-0334-ypt_PT
dc.identifier.issn1471-230X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.10/1595
dc.language.isoengpt_PT
dc.peerreviewedyespt_PT
dc.publisherBioMed Centralpt_PT
dc.relation.publisherversionhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4545536/pt_PT
dc.subjectCholecystectomypt_PT
dc.subjectBiliary tract diseasespt_PT
dc.subjectColecistectomiapt_PT
dc.subjectDoenças biliarespt_PT
dc.subjectStentspt_PT
dc.titleOutcomes of endoscopic management of primary and refractory postcholecystectomy biliary leaks in a multicentre review of 178 patientspt_PT
dc.typejournal article
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.conferencePlaceLondonpt_PT
oaire.citation.titleBMC gastroenterologypt_PT
rcaap.rightsopenAccesspt_PT
rcaap.typearticlept_PT

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
BMC Gastroenterol. 2015 Aug 19, 15, 105.pdf
Size:
484.4 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: