Repository logo
 
Publication

Nonculprit Stenosis Evaluation Using Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

dc.contributor.authorThim, T
dc.contributor.authorGotberg, M
dc.contributor.authorFrobert, O
dc.contributor.authorNijveldt, R
dc.contributor.authorvan Royen, N
dc.contributor.authorBaptista, SB
dc.contributor.authorKoul S, et al.
dc.date.accessioned2018-04-12T10:12:17Z
dc.date.available2018-04-12T10:12:17Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to examine the level of agreement between acute instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) measured across nonculprit stenoses in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and iFR measured at a staged follow-up procedure. BACKGROUND: Acute full revascularization of nonculprit stenoses in STEMI is debated and currently guided by angiography. Acute functional assessment of nonculprit stenoses may be considered. METHODS: Immediately after successful primary culprit intervention for STEMI, nonculprit coronary stenoses were evaluated with iFR and left untreated. Follow-up evaluation with iFR was performed at a later stage. iFR <0.90 was considered hemodynamically significant. RESULTS: One hundred twenty patients with 157 nonculprit lesions were included. Median acute iFR was 0.89 (interquartile range [IQR]: 0.82 to 0.94; n = 156), and median follow-up iFR was 0.91 (interquartile range: 0.86 to 0.96; n = 147). Classification agreement was 78% between acute and follow-up iFR. The negative predictive value of acute iFR was 89%. Median time from acute to follow-up evaluation was 16 days (IQR: 5 to 32 days). With follow-up within 5 days after STEMI, no difference was observed between acute and follow-up iFR, and classification agreement was 89%. With follow-up ≥16 days after STEMI, acute iFR was lower than follow-up iFR, and classification agreement was 70%. CONCLUSIONS: Acute iFR evaluation appeared valid for ruling out significant nonculprit stenoses in patients with STEMI undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. The time interval from acute to follow-up iFR influenced classification agreement, suggesting that inherent physiological disarrangements during STEMI may contribute to classification disagreement.pt_PT
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionpt_PT
dc.identifier.citationJACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Dec 26;10(24):2528-2535.pt_PT
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jcin.2017.07.021pt_PT
dc.identifier.issn1876-7605
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.10/1984
dc.language.isoengpt_PT
dc.peerreviewedyespt_PT
dc.publisherElsevierpt_PT
dc.subjectMyocardial infarctionpt_PT
dc.subjectMyocardial revascularizationpt_PT
dc.titleNonculprit Stenosis Evaluation Using Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.pt_PT
dc.typejournal article
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.conferencePlaceNew Yorkpt_PT
oaire.citation.endPage2535pt_PT
oaire.citation.startPage2528pt_PT
oaire.citation.titleJournal of the American College of Cardiology cardiovascular interventionspt_PT
oaire.citation.volume10pt_PT
rcaap.rightsclosedAccesspt_PT
rcaap.typearticlept_PT

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
1-s2.0-S193687981731498X.pdf
Size:
472.06 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: